This article first appeared in Commerce & Industry Magazine Vol 2 010 of Feb 2014
From the inception of performance contracting in the Public Sector in Kenya, the notion of Customer Service Charters has been discussed as a way to keep the service sector in check. By having the public aware of the commitment the institution is making, and the service levels to expect from the service provider, there has been a shift in customer expectations.
From the inception of performance contracting in the Public Sector in Kenya, the notion of Customer Service Charters has been discussed as a way to keep the service sector in check. By having the public aware of the commitment the institution is making, and the service levels to expect from the service provider, there has been a shift in customer expectations.
From the original discussions
held in April 2005, the Public Service Reform and Development Secretariat,
charged with the responsibility of developing structures for performance contracting,
defined the desired customer service charter in article 51 of their
blueprint for sector reforms as “A Service Charter is a Public Statement or
‘Contract’ that defines and declares what an organization is, the
organization’s mandate, the services the organization provides, details of any
user charges, what standards of services should be expected by the consumers
and how the consumers of the service may seek redress if they are dissatisfied
with the service(s) provided”. They went further to summarize Service
Charters as “providing commitments to provide a certain type, volume and quality of
service as well as stating client obligations, providing greater client choice
in service delivery and detailing complaints and redress mechanisms”.
This more than adequately
captures the essence and importance of Customer Service Charters and
underscores the rationale for every institution both in the private and public
sector to have one. The private sector in principle seems to have caught on and
have these charters under several different titles including ‘Service Delivery
Statements’ ‘Customer Service Promises’ or ‘Customer Service Expectations’.
Whatever fancy name is applied, the definition of the Customer Service Charter as
outlined in the Public Sector arena, by far and large articulately enumerates
in detail the specific grounding tenets that should be applied.
Pressing the fast forward button to current times, we find that with
the present government of the day, the Ministry of Devolution and Planning that
has a specific unit handling performance contracting, demands performance
against targets set out in the individual Ministries, Departments and Agencies’
(MDAs) Customer Service Charters. This extends to Parastatals and all public
service commissions and boards, and forms a significant subject of discussion
during the end of period appraisals. So serious is this matter that the
charters are on display, well framed and in public sight on the walls of all public
institutions.
The situation so far sounds very
nice, well put together and all set right? What with service contracts in place,
appropriate well thought out information captured on charters, service delivery
promises and customer commitments dotting the public sector, what more could a
country need? Well, the critical
question to ask at this point is if indeed this is a workable system of
operation or just a fad that seems to have taken the country by storm.
In as much as the proverbial writing may be on
the wall, and indeed sitting pretty, the crunch point remains if this writing
translates into actualization. The fact
that public sector organizations have thought through their individual brand
promises and the service delivery standards they would like to commit to their customers,
counts for much. The fact that they have gone a step ahead and documented
these, proudly hung them up on their walls and posted them on their websites is
indeed a huge milestone. The next step would then be to have systems and
structures in place to deliver on these promises and to encourage customers to
agitate for service delivery.
What would catapult a Customer Service
Charter from being a decorative ‘Wall Hanging’ to being a useful communication
tool for excellent customer service delivery? The secret lies in three simple
points.
The first and most important
strategy is to communicate your customer service charter consistently. In
addition to prominently displaying it, the leadership of the institution must
ensure staff at all levels are aware of the promises made in the charter. The
internal customers should be the first advocates and proponents of the charter.
The charter should not be seen as something the ‘leadership’ have put up or
something routine that is hung on the wall in the same format as the obligatory
presidential portraits or organization signage, but as a heartfelt promise. This
communication should be consistent and repetitive and should form the opening
and closing agenda during meetings, at staff induction and appraisals and at
every opportunity that presents itself for reinforcement. The more internal
staff hear about and understand the rationale and benefit, the more likely they
are to own the promise and strive to deliver on it.
The second secret to Customer
Service Charter success is to be in constant touch with the stakeholders for
whom the charter was developed – the customers. By seeking customer feedback
continuously, and conducting a comparative analysis of the promises made versus
the feedback received, the institution will have a good platform to make the
necessary adjustments to work towards achievement of the charter declarations.
Customer feedback should be sought through both formal and informal means to
assess service delivery performance. The people to whom the promises are made
are the best test to weigh if the promises are being delivered as per
expectation. Listening to your customers and implementing relevant changes is a
strategy that has proven over time to yield consistently exceptional results.
The third strategy towards successful
Customer Service Charter implementation is to continuously measure progress. As
wisdom dictates - ‘things that cannot be
measured do not exist’. In tandem with this, each institution should query
their charter if it already exists or build in if developing a new charter,
instituted measurement parameters per promise to assess performance. These
parameters should be simple, clear and concise, enabling performance analysis
to yield straight forward results. The assessment should be conducted regularly
and persons in charge of conducting this exercise should derive results that
are easily communicated across to all staff, to understand the impact of their
activities. The results should also be clear enough to enable and influence
strategic decision making.
It would add value to conduct a
country wide audit of the Customer Service Charters in place and the internal
and external customer assessment on performance. This would then inform the
specific institution as well as provide a good base for similar institutions
seeking to develop charters, to learn from the experiences of those who have
gone before. And if the results of these audits would be published, it would enable
the wider public from both the formal and informal sector to borrow the
positive aspects and be cognizant of the areas for improvement to inform their
specific situations.
Sylvester Odhiambo Obong'o in his
treatise ‘ Implementation of performance
contracting in Kenya’ very rightly
postulates that Kenya introduced
performance contracting not only improve service delivery but also to refocus
the mind set of public service away from a culture of inward looking towards a
culture of business as focused on customer and results. Indeed customer service charters are a useful
tool towards delivery of exceptional customer service. It is however incumbent
on the charter developers to go beyond development and invest in implementation
for success.
·