This article first appeared in Commerce and Industry Magazine Vol 2 No 008 August 2013
When
we conjure up images of well blended bone soup with the marrow and herbs all
fused into a great tasting broth, the elements that make the sum total of the
whole evoke a very warm feeling. When we list the terms customer service and the
manufacturing industry side by side in pot, there seems to be some
incongruence. No warm feeling emanates and the two are not seen to fit together
like hand and glove as is the case with companies dealing directly with customers
like those in the hospitality industry, banking, insurance or other retail sectors.
What
comes to mind when we think of ‘manufacturing’ is lines, conveyor belts,
machines, processors and power; all hard, cold, mechanical and functional
elements. But giving it serious thought, we actually need to reconsider the
fundamental role customer service plays in this industry. And as remote as it
sounds with regards to the subject, customer service should in reality form the
pivot around which manufacturing spins.
Let’s for starters take a look at the definition
of manufacturing from various sources. ‘Manufacturing is the use of machines,
tools and labor to make things for use or sale’, ‘To make or process raw
material into a finished product’ and ‘To make or process goods, especially in
large quantities by means of industrial machines’. All these definitions have
once common denominator – end product. And naturally therefore, we ask the
leading question about who this end product is ‘produced’ or ‘manufactured’
for. Yes - The Customer.
Why then is the end customer not given due
recognition by the industry? To further explore this subject, I conducted a
small poll amongst a sample group from my friends, colleagues and family and
asked what they’d do if they found one of the manufactured products they’d
bought had a problem. Many were not sure if they’d return the item to the
supermarket or store where they bought it from or if they’d try and contact the
manufacturer. What was clear however was that the procedure for complaint was definitely
unclear. Not one single person knew
firmly what action to take in event of a product defect. When we juxtapose this
with the service industry, it pales in comparison as there, aggrieved parties
are very quick to escalate service failure to the supervisor or manager in
charge.
I was inspired by these interesting results to
further carry out an inspection exercise of the various manufactured goods on our
super market shelves, to discern if the existing communication advises customers
of what to do in event they encounter a product issue. My scrutiny included a wide range of products
including food products, a host of detergents, pet food, spices, toilet paper, beauty
products and household goods. Much to my consternation, the products all have
insufficient information on this subject.
Most
products had only the address and telephone contacts of the manufacturer under
a title ‘Manufactured by’ or ‘Produced and packaged by’. Some had gone a little
further to label the telephone lines ‘customer care’ lines and the closest to
being remotely advisory, was on a box of cereal that read “in event of a
problem with this product please return it with the label indicating the sell
by date to our customer service department”. It didn't have specifics of their
physical location or the location of the said customer service department. Three
items had a toll free 0800 number that I called and didn't get through in two
cases and in one case the number went unanswered. These unstructured findings of my dipstick
poll had me seriously consider preparing a proposal to interest our vibrant
research firms to conduct a proper survey on the customer response mechanisms for
our manufactured goods.
That all said, the question that still baffles,
is how the manufacturing industry is driving change and innovating for the
customer. There exists a concerted effort to check on quality control for products
with in situ quality control departments, but what actually informs the
initiatives in place to repackage, re-invent and revive products? How do they
tap into customers’ direct feedback to assess the uptake of products and what
needs to be done to tweak them to serve the emerging needs? How does the industry innovate? It is said
that innovative thinking is looking at the customer's routine outside the
company’s existing products and then innovating to add value. How then should
the manufacturing industry look at the customer and hear them first hand?
Having explicit information on product
packaging on how to report a defect, complete with legit contact details should
be the first and mandatory step. This packaging should also encourage other regular
feedback to institute direct communication that enables the manufacturer hear straight
from the ‘horse’s mouth’. This initiative would also have the added spin off of
easier identification and reporting that would boost the government’s effort to
curb the influx of sub-standard, counterfeit and contra-band good, as customers
would be the first to call in to report fake products.
And although players in the manufacturing
industry often view their main customers as the distributors and seek to
streamline their orders, logistics and supply issues, the heartbeat remains
unchecked. The 2011 study from Deloitte on Global Manufacturing Industry
Practice says “The business model of global manufacturers is under attack due
to changing customer demands. Confronted by competitors, escalating complexity
of supply chains and ever-increasing customer demands, manufacturers ignoring
the needs of the service business do so at their peril”. The customer indeed needs to be at the centre
of it all.
Given these observations and projections, the
manufacturing industry in Kenya needs to rethink their service delivery strategy
and build in communication streams that directly flow from the customer. Where applicable,
a mechanism to channel back feedback provided to distributors in the supply
chain should be built in.
With Kenya’s current economic lift off, manufacturing
is among the key productive sectors identified for economic growth and
development. This is attributed to its centrality to creation of economic
stimulus, and the anticipated jobs for the youth in the counties countrywide, to
alleviate poverty. It is therefore both our individual and collective
responsibility to add value to the sector as an area that spurs growth towards
the country’s achievement of Vision 2030 goals with specific reference to the economic
vision in chapter 4 section 4.4 that challenges the nation to manufacture for
the entire region.
So to all manufacturer s out there – I
challenge you to ‘talk’ to your consumers and to all consumers out there –
agitate to ‘talk’ to your manufacturers.
No comments:
Post a Comment