I recently had an unfortunate experience with my bank where
money was fraudulently withdrawn from my account. The withdrawer seemed to have
quite some knowledge of the system for they withdrew the maximum daily allowable
amount just shy of midnight and then withdrew the same maximum just after
midnight. Shortly after which they attempted a point of sale transaction. As is
the case nowadays, text notifications are sent when transactions are done and
so I of course much to my shock and horror saw these on waking up, long after the
deed had been done.
I called the emergency line indicated on the transaction
texts and as this was about five am in the morning, spoke with a quite a sleepy
but extremely helpful technical gentleman. He did all of the following things: empathized
deeply with the situation; tried to
explain what could have happened; asked me if I had collected my new chip and
pin ATM card; explained why these are a safer option and urged me to get mine
immediately; advised that he is blocking my card so that no further attempts
could be made; requested that I go into the bank first thing in the morning and
report my case; assisted to locate the
nearest bank branch to me; and commiserated with me on my unfortunate
circumstance.
Now………. Ultimately when you look at his response, he didn’t
do anything out of the ordinary or out of his job description. The technical
functionality of what he was to do was done. However, as a result of the way in
which he treated me and handled my case albeit over the telephone, left me feeling
immediately better, heard, felt and cared for. He served to reassure me massively
and I took down his name. Kennedy. I have written to the bank to commend him.
Fast forward into the morning after I arrived at the nearest
bank branch as per Kennedy’s advice. My experience there left me quite
frustrated and angry. At the bank I was just ‘another’ customer with ‘another’
problem. No empathy, no commiseration, nothing. I was asked to fill in a form,
write a statement and wait for them to investigate. On asking how long this ‘investigation’
would take, I was duly informed in a very cursory manner that it on average
takes fourty five working days. It was only upon raising my voice and indicating
that asking a customer to wait fourty five working days for an investigation in
a case where the customer is sleeping in their bed at night knowing that the money
they have deposited in the bank whose responsibility is to safeguard it has disappeared
as a result of a security lapse was not in order, did I get attention and was
requested to check the following week. I took down the name of the person serving
me. Her name was Lillian.
Further fast forward into mid-morning when I had now gone to
my specific branch to pick up my chip and pin ATM card, still as per the good
Kennedy’s advice. On speaking with the teller and explaining why I didn't have
my old card to exchange to get the new one and that the branch where I had
reported requested for a confirmatory call to authorize its release, he was
suitably sympathetic. The nice young man behind the counter made my day: he
made sympathetic noises; was suitably aghast that not only was it an attempt,
but that the perpetrator succeeded in the withdrawal; empathized at how shocked
I must have been; worried for me that I had been set back quite some
financially; and comforted me that with the new chip and pin the risk was
significantly less. He too served to reassure me massively. I took down his
name. Samuel. I have also written to the bank to commend him.
My morning’s experiences served to emphasize the need for
customer response standardization. I marveled at how within the same institution,
Kennedy and Samuel were very customer centric. Although they did nothing to
resolve the fact that my money had disappeared from my account, they were so
pleasant to deal with, walked in the customer’s shoes and genuinely showed
concern for me. Whereas Lillian, their colleague, handled me just like any other customer in her
queue or perhaps, just another one of those customers alleging to be a victim of banking
fraud……….
In terms of rank and seniority, Kennedy and Samuel were by
far less senior than Lillian, but their customer handling skills were by far superior.
I wonder if this experience lends itself to the notion that in organizations,
the higher one is in the pecking order the less sensitive they are to customer situations?
I am very afraid that this may be the norm and not an exception?
I challenge organizations out here, no matter the size or
nature, to have a standardized format for customer responses. Customer’s love
order and predictability. They do. And what makes a brand formidable, is that
customers know what to expect and then proceed to expect it across all customer touch points.
It is my intention to talk to the bank management and take
them through my experience from a customer’s stand point emphasizing how in my service
failure situation, Kennedy and Samuel, still had me smile and feel cared for. It
is my hope that they will use this learning to convert the same cast different
script situation into the same script different cast going forward. I hope it
is not too much to hope for?
No comments:
Post a Comment